Hi Efraim, On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 at 21:30, Efraim Flashner <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > I would have assumed that it would check for all of the substitute urls >> > I listed and not just the first one. Most of the packages listed below >> > I've test built on my pine64 so they shouldn't appear in the list >> > anymore. >> >> I think #44688 [1] fixes it. Please let me know. >> >> 1: <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/44688> > > I had hoped for a unified list of the missing packages between the two > or more build machines but the separate output is also useful. With a > unified list it's possible to see which packages are missing overall and > need fixing/building. Ah, this a feature request. ;-) I agree it could be really helpful. Cheers, simon
