Pierre Neidhardt <m...@ambrevar.xyz> skribis: > Thanks for taking a shot at this, looks great! > > I'll test later, but for now one question: we patch sbcl to use our > cl-asdf, but what about the other compilers? Seems to me that the other > compilers are going to have the same problem, aren't they?
SBCL and ECL are patched to use our cl-asdf because it is necessary to build the sbcl-* and ecl-* packages. Also patching ABCL, CCL, and Clisp sounds like a good idea. At least all the compilers would use the same version of ASDF, and hopefully behave in the same way when looking for configuration files.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
