Hi Leo,
Leo Prikler <[email protected]> skribis:
> it has come to my attention due to the recent reporting of #45830 and
> some conversation in IRC, that cups-service-type adds an lp group,
> which is already defined in %base-groups. Since both share the same
> definition, this is not too big an issue, but it prohibits us from
> using a hard error for #45770.
>
> I can currently think of two solutions: Either remove the lp group from
> cups-service-type or remove it from base-groups. Neither sounds
> particularly awesome. Perhaps we could also delete identical
> duplicates before asserting that there are none for #45770, but that
> sounds like a little much effort. Any ideas how else to solve this?
I’d be pragmatic here:
1. Ignore duplicates that are identical (don’t report them).
2. Remove “lp” from %base-groups since it has no use without CUPS
(right?).
Thanks,
Ludo’.
