zimoun <[email protected]> skribis: > Hi, > > On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 at 14:41, Guillaume Le Vaillant <[email protected]> wrote: >> zimoun <[email protected]> skribis: >> >>> Using Guix 58af4c9, the package ’sbcl’ seems not-reproducible. > > [...] > >> Removing this source file timestamp from compiled files would simplify >> things. Maybe nothing really depends on it and it would be possible... > > Any news from upstream? Still unreproducible for me. > > > All the best, > simon
So far Slime still uses the function getting the source file timestamp, so these timestamps can't be removed from SBCL. A patch for Slime would be accepted (see [2]), but as far as I know nobody has worked on it yet. [2] https://github.com/slime/slime/issues/583
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
