Hi, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <[email protected]> skribis:
> I should note that later in the IRC convo I corrected my sloppy ‘full’ > to ‘hash collision’. Unfortunately it just returns an already > overloaded -ENOSPC to user space. OK, but when do we get ENOSPC, then? > Ludovic Courtès 写道： [...] >> I don’t think we can claim there’s a design flaw. WDYT? > > Fine; implementation flaw, then? Problem is, it's not like there are > other implementations than the one we're stuck with, so it matters > little what we call it. My point is that we shouldn’t suggest that ext4 + dir_index is flawed or unsuitable for Guix use, because we have strong evidence suggesting otherwise. :-) Now, I agree that if there are bugs or limitations hit in some situations, we should document (or fix) them. WDYT? Thanks, Ludo’.
