> When rolling back to an older guix@f1bfd9f, things work as expected. The
> regression probably lies in between those 1084 commits. I'll try to
> bisect more precisely later on.

The bisection leads to this commit:
8cef92d0633850d97c1a1d4521812268f56672be, but it doesn't appear clearly
to me what could cause the regression.

Mathieu



Reply via email to