Hi! Chris Marusich <[email protected]> skribis:
> As an aside, when do we remove old versions of glibc? Good question. I’d say it’s enough to keep 3 versions in total. Currently the main (only?) use case for these is when computing locale data via the ‘locale-libcs’ field of operating system definitions. Thoughts? > From ef169adea6f9ca971e22845b839511b015cbc76c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Chris Marusich <[email protected]> > Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2021 16:49:49 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: glibc-2.31: Restore patches. > > Commit 87961fc965b96ac0c7a5909ac2faab2d023b5339 inadvertently modified the > patch set for glibc-2.31. This change restores the original patch set. > > Fixes: <https://bugs.gnu.org/49516>. > > * gnu/packages/base.scm (glibc-2.31) [source]: Use the same patches as glibc, > but replace glibc-hurd-clock_gettime_monotonic.patch with > glibc-2.31-hurd-clock_gettime_monotonic.patch, and add > glibc-hurd-signal-sa-siginfo.patch. > * gnu/packages/patches/glibc-2.31-hurd-clock_gettime_monotonic.patch: Add it. > * gnu/packages/patches/glibc-hurd-signal-sa-siginfo.patch: Add it. > * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Adjust accordingly. LGTM, thanks! Ludo’.
