Sorry for the possible confusion. These replies stacked up in my client and I 
didn't notice until they were sent just now. Please disregard :)

Le 14 septembre 2021 07:37:53 GMT-04:00, Julien Lepiller <[email protected]> a 
écrit :
>Again this is exactly where I was blocked. There is a checksum being generated 
>in classlist files from java code during the build. The classlist file is 
>exactly the same as the one in master, so it's correctly generated. Fowever, 
>at some point, the process needs toqload that file, and that ultimately calls 
>some C code (identical to the java code) that re-computes and compares the 
>checksum. After printing some values, it seems that it always computes "0…031" 
>as the hash of any classlist file, despite running the function and taking 
>everything into account. I think this is again an optimization issue, anl it's 
>not clear how to work around that.
>
>Le 14 septembre 2021 04:44:18 GMT-04:00, "Ludovic Courtès" <[email protected]> a 
>écrit :
>>Hi Guillaume,
>>
>>Guillaume Le Vaillant <[email protected]> skribis:
>>
>>> I'm trying to get icedtea-6 to build on the core-updates-frozen branch.
>>> I fixed a few C/C++ related issues,
>>
>>Thanks for fixing those!  After <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/49990#10>
>>Julien mentioned on IRC that using an older GCC allowed us to work
>>around those C++ issues, but your approach looks nicer to me.
>>
>>> but then I get this error:
>>>
>>> Preload failed: checksum of class list was incorrect.
>>> make: *** [Makefile:2746: stamps/add-archive-ecj.stamp] Error 1
>>
>>Woow, never seen that.  Julien, Ricardo, does that ring a bell?
>>
>>Java is the main stumbling block on core-updates-frozen; making
>>progress!
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Ludo’.

Reply via email to