Philip McGrath schreef op ma 27-12-2021 om 13:38 [-0500]: > I think the behavior of `gexp->approximate-sexp` is at least defensible, > since its documentation (`info guix "gexp->approximate-sexp"`) warns > that "some information can be lost".
But no information is lost in this case? $ guix repl > (use-modules (guix gexp)) > (gexp->approximate-sexp #~(a . #nil)) $1 = (a) ; sure, the #nil isn't printed ... > (cdr $1) $2 = () ; ... also not printed ... > (values (eq? (cdr $1) #nil) (eq? (cdr $1) '())) $3 = #t ; but it's still there! $4 = #f Greetings, Maxime
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
