zimoun schreef op wo 23-03-2022 om 11:45 [+0100]: > > On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 at 20:07, Efraim Flashner > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > …the package redis is not a dependency of gitolite. Therefore, > > > > the > > > > question is: is our Gitolite package working with Redis? Even > > > > using the > > > > /usr/bin one? Idem for SVN. > > > > > > > > Otherwise, I am favor to remove the 2 “problematic” > > > > references. WDYT? > > > > > > Or change it to search the $PATH for the binary, so it would just > > > be > > > 'redis-server' or 'svnserve' > > > > Is our Gitolite package working with Redis? If not, why try to > > fix. ;-) > > What is the status of this old bug [1]? Is it actionable? If yes, > what > is the action? If no, let close it. :-) WDYT?
Seems like all we have to do is 'substitute*' a '/usr/bin/svnserve' into a '/gnu/store/...' (untested), so seems actionable to me. Alternatively, as Efraim wrote, let it search the $PATH (that might be useful if adding svnserve would increase the closure too much and it is an optional dependency in practice?). Greetings, Maxime.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
