Hi, Maxim Cournoyer <[email protected]> skribis:
> I'd be OK with --without-bash-malloc; it seems we'll pay a bit in terms > of Bash performance in exchange for better memory usage. It also brings > benefits such as solving this issue and may benefit from > advances/bugfixes to glibc's malloc in the future, if there are any. We might actually benefit from the improvements made in glibc’s malloc over the years (it’s more actively developed than that of Bash), who knows. Anyway, pushed to ‘core-updates’ as c6b5161e97ed1010d61331874b09c3231af3b1f9. Thanks, Ludo’.
