On 2022-05-06, [email protected] wrote: > On Fri, 06 May 2022 00:50:21 +0200 > Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The log goes like this: >> ... >> + guix shell --export-manifest gsl openblas gcc-toolchain --tune > > This seems to be the important part, it looks like the CPU arch isn't > being detected. > >> Backtrace: >> In ice-9/boot-9.scm: >> 1752:10 13 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _) >> In unknown file: >> 12 (apply-smob/0 #<thunk 5bd2e0>) >> In ice-9/boot-9.scm: >> 724:2 11 (call-with-prompt _ _ #<procedure >> default-prompt-handle…>) In ice-9/eval.scm: >> 619:8 10 (_ #(#(#<directory (guile-user) 5c2c80>))) >> In guix/ui.scm: >> 2230:7 9 (run-guix . _) >> 2193:10 8 (run-guix-command _ . _) >> In guix/scripts/shell.scm: >> 160:17 7 (guix-shell . _) >> In ice-9/boot-9.scm: >> 1747:15 6 (with-exception-handler #<procedure 4bd7b0 at ice-9/bo…> >> …) In srfi/srfi-37.scm: >> 201:16 5 (next-arg) >> 113:18 4 (invoke-option-processor _ _ _ _ _) >> In unknown file: >> 3 (_ #<procedure 4bd660 at srfi/srfi-37.scm:114:22 ()> # #) >> 2 (_ #<procedure 9aa9c0 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:798:28 ()> # #) >> In guix/transformations.scm: >> 864:25 1 (_ _ _ _ ((package ad-hoc-package "gcc-toolchain") (…) >> …)) In guix/cpu.scm: >> 94:2 0 (cpu->gcc-architecture #f) > > This indicates the same to me. > But I don't know the internals of --tune well enough, so it's just a > hunch. > >> guix/cpu.scm:94:2: In procedure cpu->gcc-architecture: >> In procedure struct-vtable: Wrong type argument in position 1 >> (expecting struct): #f >> + rm -r t-guix-manifest-12319 >> FAIL tests/guix-shell-export-manifest.sh (exit status: 1) >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
I'm getting this same error too; happy to test any proposed patches. live well, vagrant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
