Hi, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prik...@gmail.com> skribis:
> Am Mittwoch, dem 03.08.2022 um 15:43 +0200 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: >> [...] >> > -(define-public fortune-mod >> >> (Perhaps also make “fortune-mod” a deprecated name for >> “fortune-jkirchartz”.) > I'm getting mixed messages here. On the one hand, Maxime suggests not > propagating daikichi from fortune-jkirchartz (which makes it a plain > data package lacking a `fortune' command), on the other we want to mark > fortune-mod as deprecated. These are mutually exclusive options. To me use of ‘deprecated-package’ in this case is just to ensure that users who run ‘guix upgrade’ will transparently get ‘fortune-jkirchartz’. I don’t have a strong opinion though. >> FWIW I’m fine with this change. Note that there’s also another patch >> that removes the ‘off’ database of ‘fortune-mod’¹, though I don’t >> know whether that would fully address the issues raised in this >> thread. It will have to closed if/once this series is applied. > IIRC, I responded to such a patch already, though perhaps not that > thread in particular. To summarize, fortune-mod also propagates non- > nice things outside of ‘off’, so removing it is not enough. Alright, let’s remove ‘fortune-mod’ then. Thanks for taking care of it! Ludo’.
