On 05-09-2022 15:06, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
The main difficulty here is that, should we eventually decide to change
behaviors, we’ll have to devise a migration timeline etc.  (As an
example, we chose to keep ‘guix environment’ until at least May 2023;
all this must take time if we want to avoid breaking user workflows.)

Thoughts?

"guix shell" is for making packages available in the environment. Currently, "guix shell -- foobar" does not make any packages available -- it's effectively a no-op except for setting GUIX_ENVIRONMENT. As such, I expect nobody is actually relying on "guix shell -- foobar" to not load guix.scm or manifest.scm and I think that if we go for this change, the migration timeline can be rather minimal.

Greetings,
Maxime.

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to