Hi, On mer., 26 avril 2023 at 11:50, Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.cour...@inria.fr> wrote:
>> swh:1:rev:1984d56b0e437af7be7fa6cf8e1a00e45eb8ffa1.git/ >> swh:1:rev:1984d56b0e437af7be7fa6cf8e1a00e45eb8ffa1.git/HEAD >> swh:1:rev:1984d56b0e437af7be7fa6cf8e1a00e45eb8ffa1.git/branches/ >> swh:1:rev:1984d56b0e437af7be7fa6cf8e1a00e45eb8ffa1.git/config >> swh:1:rev:1984d56b0e437af7be7fa6cf8e1a00e45eb8ffa1.git/description [...] > I suspect this is an issue at SWH. I’ll bring it up there. Aside the potential bug on SWH side, maybe we could ask a flat cooking instead of a git-bare cooking. Considering the size of the Guix repository, it can take hours to cook it – remember the test with CRLF ;-) – when most of the time, we need only one specific revision. Somehow, we could tweak ’clone-from-swh’ from (guix git) to use 'flat instead of 'git-bare. However, I am unsure the other tweaks it would require since a Git repository is somehow expected. Cheers, simon
