Hi, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <[email protected]> skribis:
> Either: > - the second invocation should imply --update, so Guix should store > the currently cache method(s), > - or Guix should use separate databases for each method. That's > probably too ugly. The latter sounds ugly. The former, why not; we then only need to distinguish between “user-specified method” and “default method” to determine whether ‘--update’ is implied. Ludo’.
