Hi,
On Tue, 03 Oct 2023 at 22:20, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree adding multiple outputs would make things complicated and messy,
> and should thus not be the approach pursued. I think this should be
> feasible via package rewriting procedures, like we had in the past for
> Python 2 with package-for-python2 or similar, which users can apply to
> their Emacs package collection in a manifest file.
For the record, it remembers these related or similar discussions:
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/41732
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/64586
Cheers,
simon
