Hi, On +2023-10-09 20:33:38 +0200, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > Am Montag, dem 09.10.2023 um 14:21 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer: > > Hello, > > > > Liliana Marie Prikler <[email protected]> writes: > > > > > [...] > > > If you need me to reduce it to four letters, yes, LGTM. > > > > Explicit is better than implicit. I've been thinking to document > > this in our contributing section; e.g. a reviewed commit must have > > the 'LGTM' from the reviewer. If a series is LGTM, it needs to be > > implicitly mentioned with 'this series LGTM'. That may sound silly, > > but I think it'd simplify reviewer/submitters interactions. > s/implicitly/explicitly/? > > I don't necessarily agree, but it's not a hard disagree either. I'll > try to keep that in mind at least when reviewing your patches to not > cause confusion. > > Cheers >
TL;DR: Would it make sense to anticipate that LLM-bots will be used to automate gathering of info for reviewers? If so, what would a style guide for english in posts (like a coding style guide, but for LLM-bot consumption) look like? Some kind of literate programming for LLM-bot and human use? (I assume experiments have been going on by now, though perhaps not yet for guile or guix) -- Regards, Bengt Richter
