Maxim Cournoyer <[email protected]> writes:
> Hi, > > Csepp <[email protected]> writes: > >> Maxim Cournoyer <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> tags 61882 +notabug >>> quit >> >> I don't think notabug applies until we actually know the root cause. > > Sadly I don't think there's anything actionable here until you can > reproduce the problem and share the recipe with us, so I wanted to close > the issue without it being marked as "resolved". Neither "resolved" nor "notabug" are applicable. If stalled incident reports / issues are a problem, they should probably be marked as stalled, or needinfo, for easy filtering. Marking it as notabug is just going to make the job of the next person harder when they search for issues related to these symptoms. I appreciate all the work going into closing old issues, but I don't think chasing a low open issue count should be a goal unto itself See https://fvsch.com/stale-bots .
