Hello, "Karl G. Hallsby" <[email protected]> writes:
> fetching path `/gnu/store/rlbyjwc1kmhwr4y3a0m31wd37l0ll024-po4a-0.69'... > Downloading > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/rlbyjwc1kmhwr4y3a0m31wd37l0ll024-po4a-0.69... > [K po4a-0.69 2.0MiB 0B/s 00:00 ? ? > 0.0% > [K po4a-0.69 2.0MiB 1.6MiB/s 00:00 ?? ? > 3.1% > [K po4a-0.69 2.0MiB 215KiB/s 00:01 ?? ? > 6.2% > [K po4a-0.69 2.0MiB 67KiB/s 00:03 ??? ? > 9.3% > [K po4a-0.69 2.0MiB 66KiB/s 00:04 ???? ? > 12.4%Backtrace: > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 1752:10 19 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _) > In cuirass/scripts/evaluate.scm: > 99:7 18 (_) > 105:27 17 (thunk) > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 1752:10 16 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _) > In guix/store.scm: > 659:37 15 (thunk) > 2168:25 14 (run-with-store #<store-connection 256.99 7fab6d89dfa0> ?) > In cuirass/scripts/evaluate.scm: > 85:6 13 (_ _) > In guix/channels.scm: > 982:2 12 (_ _) > 924:2 11 (_ _) > In guix/monads.scm: > 487:9 10 (_ _) > In guix/store.scm: > 1996:8 9 (_ _) > In guix/channels.scm: > 675:14 8 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7fab6d89dfa0>) > In guix/store.scm: > 2168:25 7 (run-with-store #<store-connection 256.99 7fab6d89dfa0> ?) > 1298:8 6 (call-with-build-handler _ _) > 1298:8 5 (call-with-build-handler #<procedure 7fab6e7dd8d8 at g?> ?) > In guix/channels.scm: > 690:14 4 (_) > In guix/store.scm: > 2168:25 3 (run-with-store #<store-connection 256.99 7fab6d89dfa0> ?) > In ice-9/eval.scm: > 191:27 2 (_ #(#(#<directory (build-self) 7fab6d8635a0> #<pr?>) ?)) > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 1685:16 1 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _) > 1685:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _) > ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception: > ERROR: > 1. &message: "You found a bug: the program > '/gnu/store/cxb9kcppq32jvjq3sqld84v2fj1k8hgi-compute-guix-derivation'\nfailed > to compute the derivation for Guix (version: > \"74d72046bdc1ed6c859565570d0db58d20c9ddd7\"; system: \"x86_64-linux\";\nhost > version: \"1.4.0-10.4dfdd82\"; pull-version: 1).\nPlease report the COMPLETE > output above by email to <[email protected]>.\n" The problem occurred while downloading a substitute, so it seems to be a bug in 'guix substitute'. Perhaps related to a network problem that was not correctly handled. The backtrace is not super useful... I wonder how we could change that. -- Thanks, Maxim
