Hi Ludo, On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 20:33, Simon Tournier <[email protected]> wrote: > On mer., 22 nov. 2023 at 13:05, Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> wrote: > >> @example >> -guix shell -D guix --pure >> +guix shell -D guix -CPW >> @end example >> >> or even, from within a Git worktree for Guix: >> >> @example >> -guix shell --pure >> +guix shell -CPW >> @end example > > I would not recommend that or adding also the option -N. Else, the > development experience can be annoying.
As said, I disagree with this change pushed by 01361d46b8e0481ad56665d7a06c276b08f59c6d. Could you revert? Because as explained by… > For instance, “make check” will probably fail because some substitutes > are missing (see #67532 [1], e.g., tests/derivations.scm). …the option ’-CPW’ is not a solution. Other said, it would require in addition ’-N’. To me, this recommendation of container is like a bazooka for chasing the real bug: about why --pure does not clean all as expected. Or why “guile” is found elsewhere? Cheers, simon
