Dear Guix, Le dimanche 07 janvier 2024 à 17:53 +0100, Liliana Marie Prikler a écrit : > I've summarised our TODOs below: Each commented line (preceded by #) > denotes a package that doesn't exist on the gnome-team branch yet. > > core:atkmm:2.28.3: Oops, I missed that one. Sorry. I checked the list by comparing our versions to those of the list, but of course, our version of "atkmm" is reported as 2.36.2, so I did not think further.
The git log shows various documentation update, build system updates, and documentation updates between 2.28.1 and 2.28.3. > #core:calls:44.2: (as said on IRC, I believe we have Calls already on gnome-team) > core:font-abattis-cantarell:0.303.1: I don’t know where this 0.303.1 tag comes from, I can’t see it. It’s neither a tag nor a gitlab release. There has only been translation updates for the appstream metadata since our commit. > core:epiphany:44.7: We now have it, thank you! > #core:gnome-logs:43.0: The day elogind supports the journald API, we will be delighted to have it (also see https://issues.guix.gnu.org/67338 ). > #core:gnome-software:44.5: I thought it was pointless to package it, but see https://issues.guix.gnu.org/68228 : it is claimed that we can use it to install flatpaks. > #core:gnome-tour:44.0: That’s Rust, unfortunately. > > I think we should settle on what to do with the gnome package soon to > not stall the branch even further. We can already start working > towards GNOME 46 after the merge :) In my opinion, we should have atkmm:2.28.3, but I see atkmm-2.28 being used as a propagated-inputs for gtkmm-3, and gtkmm-3 is an input for inkscape. That’s a world rebuild… For Cantarell fonts, maybe we should point to the latest commit? That’s another world rebuild though, and for very little gain as of now. I’m not sure a flatpak-only gnome software is a hard requirement. It would be most confusing. Gnome-tour is nice, but I think we can live without it until we figure out this “rust” stuff. > There is some gnome-adjacent software (particularly extensions, I > don't > want all of them to break like they did the last time and the time > before) to have a look at as well before the merge You mean, the gnome-shell-extension-* in (gnu packages gnome-xyz)? I don’t use them (I was told they were frequently broken so I never bothered to try them!) so I’m not sure I can reliably tell whether they work correctly. Best regards, Vivien P.S. After a brief period of not being able to send an e-mail, this is the first I send with my new email-key-rotation-service-type! I hope it travels safely to your inbox. https://labo.planete-kraus.eu/email-key-rotation.git/tree/README.org
