Hello, Maxim Cournoyer <[email protected]> writes:
> Hi Leo et al., > > Leo Famulari <[email protected]> writes: > >> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 04:55:13AM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: >>> I see now that I'm using an older version, although I would have >>> preferred the newer one. I refer to the variable name 'inkscape' from >>> my manifest file, and I expected that to point to the latest stable >>> version. However, it seems that one must use the 'inkscape-1.0' >>> variable to get the latest stable version. That's seems suboptimal. >>> >>> I wonder if the 'inkscape' variable should be renamed 'inkscape/stable' >>> (for use in packages such as 'dblatex/stable'), and then 'inkscape' >>> could be repurposed to point to the latest stable version. Thoughts? >> >> I think we should do this, or even remove the old Inkscape package now. >> >> I'm guessing the reason for keeping the older release series is that >> the Inkscape save-file format changed? > > The reason [email protected] is still kept around is becauseInkscape@1 > doesn't build on ARM (more accurately, one of its dependencies, > lib2geom, doesn't). It's been a while since I looked at the issue, and > it seems there may have been some activity in lib2geom upstream to try > to address the problem, so we should revisit it. That's not relevant anymore, but our current inkscape 1.2 depends on imagemagick still. Seeing how it now links directly to it, I've added it to inputs as well in commit 552ebc47af and pushed to core-updates. Closing! -- Thanks, Maxim
