Hi, "Jelle Licht" <jli...@posteo.net> writes:
> This is still an issue; > should we wait for someone to properly package things, or should be > remove the llhttp package that currently exists along with its only > dependent (restinio)? There’s no policy in place saying that this should be removed, even though it’s clearly not great. I’m a bit confused though: isn’t ‘llhttp-bootstrap’ precisely about generating that C file? What’s missing? Thanks, Ludo’.
