Hello, I am fine with that incremental approach.
If you don't mind, in order to make the job of the committer as easy as possible, I will gather your patches into a PR on codeberg. Thank you, Mathieu Lirzin Kristiyan Kanchev <[email protected]> writes: > Hello, > Sorry for the delayed response, I'm on FOSDEM now but unfortunately, I won't > be abe to attend Guix Days. > I think the best route is to merge my patches as is and then open a new PR on > codeberg updating only the resolver. > I'm absolutely sure that resolver 1.6 is enough for clojure to function > properly, but also agree with your remarks that 1.8 would be even > better. However, I don't think maven-resolver 1.8 is ported on Guix now, so > this would involve some more porting and it's better to > tackle this in a future PR. What do you think? > > // > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2026, 20:10 Mathieu Lirzin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello Kristiyan, > > Do you agree with the rationale for making clojure-tools-deps depend on > maven-resolver 1.8.2 instead of 1.6.3 ? > > Given your understandeable dishartenment, Are you still interested in > giving a second shot by opening PR on codeberg containing the updated > package definition ? > > Since dependency resolution problem is forcing me to fallback on using > ‘clojure-tools-bin’ from nonguix which is frustrating, I am willing to > take the burden of opening the PR and pinging people on IRC until some > committer gets to merge it, if you prefer. > > What is more comfortable to you ? > > Mathieu > > Ben Sturmfels <[email protected]> writes: > > > Mathieu Lirzin <[email protected]> writes: > > > >> My recommandation is similar to what Kristiyan has done. I am > >> perfectly > >> fine with the usage of maven-3.8-core as input to clojure-tools-deps > >> package. However as you suggested I am in favour of depending on > >> maven-resolver-1.8 instead of maven-resolver-1.6 because this is > >> safer > >> to depends on a minor version that matches what is distributed in > >> the > >> upstream clojure-tools bundle JAR. > > > > Thanks. I'm no expert in analysing JAR files, but upstream > > clojure-tools does appear to be depending on maven-resolver 1.8. The > > linux-install.sh fetches > > > https://github.com/clojure/brew-install/releases/download/1.12.4.1602/clojure-tools-1.12.4.1602.tar.gz > > which installs the included > > clojure-tools/clojure-tools-1.12.4.1602.jar. That JAR has > > META-INF/maven/org.apache.maven.resolver/maven-resolver-api/pom.properties, > > which lists: > > > > artifactId=maven-resolver-api > > groupId=org.apache.maven.resolver > > version=1.8.2 > > > > Same for the include JAR in Guix's very slightly older version > > 1.12.4.1582. > > > > Regards, > > Ben > > >
