Hi,
For more details, see:
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/44112
On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 at 13:11, Simon Tournier <[email protected]> wrote:
>> [2] https://github.com/slime/slime/issues/583
>
> This is now closed. Well, using Guix b17268b, I get:
>
> $ diff -r --no-dereference
> /gnu/store/nfklpxiwjp36rpsfgr4jkr62cwb64ylw-sbcl-2.5.2-doc{,-check}
> Binary files
> /gnu/store/nfklpxiwjp36rpsfgr4jkr62cwb64ylw-sbcl-2.5.2-doc/share/doc/sbcl/sbcl.pdf
> and
> /gnu/store/nfklpxiwjp36rpsfgr4jkr62cwb64ylw-sbcl-2.5.2-doc-check/share/doc/sbcl/sbcl.pdf
> differ
>
> So the package ’sbcl’ is not fully reproducible yet.
Please note that SBCL the package 2.6.2 is still not reproducible:
https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/pulls/6805#issuecomment-12251049
> However, the
> initial report seems fixed. Therefore, I propose to close. And we can
> open another issue if or when we will be annoyed by the unreproducible
> PDF. WDYT?
What appears to you the more adequate next actionable step?
Cheers,
simon
