Am Sun, Apr 26, 2026 at 10:59:20PM +0200 schrieb Hugo Buddelmeijer: > For reference, I think this line is the first error in the 2026-04-24 > 14:46:15 run: > https://data.qa.guix.gnu.org/job/19775 > ▶ 201/389 /filenamecompleter/basic - > GLib-GIO:ERROR:../glib-2.86.0/gio/tests/filenamecompleter.c:83:run_test_cases: > assertion failed (all_expected_completions == all_results_completions): > first differing element at index 0: > "/tmp/guix-build-glib-2.86.0.drv-0/test_filenamecompleter_89EGO3/filenamecompleter/basic/.dirs/home/file_1" > does not equal > "/tmp/guix-build-glib-2.86.0.drv-0/test_filenamecompleter_89EGO3/filenamecompleter/basic/.dirs/home/folder_1/" > FAIL
This is the derivation /gnu/store/mn9ybb131n0kbhnhyjz7x42brvrm6v8s-glib-2.86.0.drv which I have built locally; and I think it has gone through with the latest evaluation of the python-team branch: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/2160600/log/raw Towards the end I see lots of marked build of /gnu/store/lcp0wbqhms4kxbilkfzzjs0x4fxm13jj-github-cli-2.83.2.drv as 'failed-dependency' but do not see which dependency is meant. And then there is the big blog uncaught throw to %exception: (#<&inferior-exception arguments: (%exception #<inferior-object #<&formatted-message format: "failed to determine which compiler is used\n" arguments: ()>>) inferior: #<inferior pipe (0 1 1) 7f5af3badc40> stack: ((#f ("ice-9/boot-9.scm" 1830 13)) (raise-exception ("ice-9/boot-9.scm" 1702 22)) (raise-exception ("ice-9/boot-9.scm" 1704 22)) (lower* ("guix/transformations.scm" 599 8)) (thunk ("guix/packages.scm" 1829 22)) (package->bag ("guix/packages.scm" 1732 16)) (#f ("guix/packages.scm" 1462 39)) (#f ("guix/memoization.scm" 100 0)) (supported-package? ("guix/packages.scm" 1484 17)) (package->job ("gnu/ci.scm" 409 11)) (filter-map ("srfi/srfi-1.scm" 806 23)) (jobs ("gnu/ci.scm" 424 2)) (map1 ("srfi/srfi-1.scm" 701 17)) (map1 ("srfi/srfi-1.scm" 701 29)) (map1 ("srfi/srfi-1.scm" 701 29)) (map1 ("srfi/srfi-1.scm" 701 29)) (map1 ("srfi/srfi-1.scm" 701 29)) (map1 ("srfi/srfi-1.scm" 701 29)) (map1 ("srfi/srfi-1.scm" 701 29)) (map1 ("srfi/srfi-1.scm" 701 29)) (map1 ("srfi/srfi-1.scm" 701 29)) (map1 ("srfi/srfi-1.scm" 701 29)) (map1 ("srfi/ ... over pages and pages of output, which is completely mysterious to me. My impression is that there has been progress, and that rebasing would be an option (but I am weary of the rust crate conflicts; I think there have been removals in master, which my standard conflict resolution approach would risk adding back). Andreas
