> So there's only one feasible solution; open a new branch for GNU > Mach and GNU Hurd, and allow the people _who still want to work > on Mach/Hurd_ do their own way.
I was under the impression we already have such a branch which ams uses. Only in the hurd module, and no, I don't want a ams-branch thingy in gnumach. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
