> On follow-up: do we want to modify all of the Hurd libraries and servers > (plus the GNU Mach maptime interface!) to also work on ``struct > timespec'' (with nanosecond resolution) instead of ``time_value_t'' (with > microsecond resolution; as it is used at the moment)?
I'd leave Mach alone for the foreseeable, but yes, timespec should be the canonical thing to use for all Hurd interfaces now. For conversions, use the TIMEVAL_TO_TIMESPEC macro everywhere. Thanks, Roland _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
