Hi, On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:21:42PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 11:45 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:56:04PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > The idea was to create new branches in the existing unionfs > > repository, rather than creating another repository. > > Hm... I have a conceptual question, then: do I understand it right > that unionmount will become a kind of a child project of unionfs? Uhm, no... You are right of course: Creating a new branch in the unionfs repository is not really the right thing in the long run. As discussed on IRC, I believe that both unionfs and unionmount should ultimately live in different directories of the main Hurd repository. (I'm not sure why unionfs was put on hurdextras in the first place -- there seems to be no problem with copyright assignments, so it can be included in the main repository just fine...) > And another one (not conceptual already): does having a Savannah > account suffice to create a new branch in the existing unionfs > repository? Having a Savannah account doesn't suffice for that; but having write permissions on the Hurd repositories does. You should have gotten that last summer... -antrik-
