Pino Toscano, le Thu 17 Nov 2011 23:10:16 +0100, a écrit : > Alle sabato 27 agosto 2011, Samuel Thibault ha scritto: > > Roland McGrath, le Sat 27 Aug 2011 10:03:24 -0700, a écrit : > > > > Pino Toscano, le Fri 26 Aug 2011 20:29:43 +0200, a écrit : > > > > > +extern vm_offset_t monotonicmmap(); > > > > > +#define monotonicname "monotonic" > > > > > > > > Ah, I was rather thinking about appending the new clock to the > > > > existing mappable clock. I don't think it is useful to separate > > > > them. > > > > > > It does seem good to consolidate on the one page, no reason to have > > > two pages. But how exactly will the user tell that he has a new > > > kernel that has both? It could be by some magic number on the page > > > or something. > > > > It could simply be the field being non-zero? > > Won't that be problematic when running a newer glibc with a older > gnumach that does not zero the page?
Older gnumach does zero the page, see mapable_time_init(). Samuel
