On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 09:47:04 +0100 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@gnu.org> wrote:
> Anatoly A. Kazantsev, on jeu. 25 janv. 2018 21:39:44 +1300, wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 21:45:59 +1300 > > "Anatoly A. Kazantsev" <anatoly.kazant...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Currently working on the following branches: > > > > > > - t/fcntl-internal.h > > > - t/verify.h > > > > Next branches I will work on are: > > So do you think the two branches above are OK formatting-wise? > > (so I can have just a quick look and commit) Yes, I think so. Except: - fcntl-internal.h file needs a description in the first line (I couldn't have come up with a meaningful description) - verify.h is under GPL3+ but should be under LGPL2.1 as was pointed by Joseph, also he suggested to replace it with _Static_assert. So I was thinking to look into it after I will have finish all branches. And I'm sorry to not post this information together with the patches. -- Regards, Anatoly
