Samuel Thibault, le jeu. 02 août 2018 00:10:01 +0200, a ecrit: > David Michael, le mer. 01 août 2018 18:05:50 -0400, a ecrit: > > On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Samuel Thibault > > <samuel.thiba...@gnu.org> wrote: > > > About glibc repositories, we should upgrade the Hurd glibc repository to > > > 2.28, when would that be fine for people using it? (I'm thinking about > > > Guix & Arch people) > > > > Now that there is an upstream release with the Hurd patches (thanks > > for doing that), my preference as a user would be to switch from the > > Savannah repo to the upstream release tarball and apply any individual > > patches required by Hurd as they pop up. > > > > Do you think Hurd-specific patches are appropriate to send to > > libc-stable for backporting to the upstream release branches? > > I don't know actually. My wild guess is that upstream will be fine to > backport anything we feel is really needed, as long as it is limited to > Hurd code. For more invasive changes, it would make sense to have a > branch in the hurd repo with normal, non-topgit, cherry-picks.
I have already cherry-picked one commit into release/2.28/master :) Samuel