Samuel Thibault, le lun. 12 nov. 2018 19:29:57 +0100, a ecrit: > Almudena Garcia, le lun. 12 nov. 2018 19:12:16 +0100, a ecrit: > > I think if you need ACPI in gnumach to provide SMP support for the > > kernel, then ACPI tables reading functionality should be in gnumach > > then? > > > > I agree. In this case, access to ACPI tables through a translator could > > produce > > a recursive dependency problem (Translator could need gnumach, and gnumach > > needs translator to enable the processors during the boot) > > But we don't need all ACPI to get what SMP needs.
I mean, the kernel can have its own ACPI implementation, just enough to get the information needed for SMP. Samuel