Damien Zammit, le dim. 15 nov. 2020 11:33:06 +1100, a ecrit: > On 14/11/20 9:09 pm, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > This looks odd to me. The "@/dev/master:" part should rather be > > dropped way before, by the code that opens /dev/master to access the > > master device port before calling device_open() on it: the translators > > shouldn't have to grok which way they were accessed. > > There are two cases to think about here: > 1) rumpdisk was booted as a bootstrapped task > 2) rumpdisk was called from a userspace translator > In both cases, you need @/dev/rumpdisk:/dev/X to be recognised as a valid > access rule.
Yes, but in both cases the piece of code that is interpreting @/dev/rumpdisk should also be eating it. Samuel
