Samuel Thibault, le sam. 03 avril 2021 14:41:59 +0200, a ecrit: > Damien Zammit, le sam. 03 avril 2021 23:16:32 +1100, a ecrit: > > +#define acpi_semaphore sem_t* > > ? Rather a sem_t, no ? Otherwise you have to uselessly handle > allocations etc. while the caller can do it.
+acpi_os_wait_semaphore(acpi_semaphore handle, u32 units, u16 timeout) Ah, no, ok, it's really meant to be a handle, so yes you have to make it a *. > > +#define acpi_spinlock sem_t* But for this one I believe it should be a sem_t, since: acpi_os_create_lock(acpi_spinlock *lockp) a pointer to it is given. Samuel
