On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 7:53 PM Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@gnu.org> wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, le mer. 29 nov. 2023 00:19:41 +0100, a ecrit: > > I'm hitting the last assertion, not sure exactly where it is coming from > yet. > > Ok, I missed updating libc :) Now fixed. I'm however getting: > > task /sbin/getty(631) looked up a bogus port 4294967295 for 28000, most > probably a bug. > > it seems the extension of MACH_PORT_DEAD doesn't work. > Thanks for checking. I think the comparison in gnumach will always be false because the name is up-cast to a mach_port_t. However, this change does not seem to be a no-op since we haven't seen this message before, right? > Samuel >
