On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 7:53 PM Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@gnu.org>

> Samuel Thibault, le mer. 29 nov. 2023 00:19:41 +0100, a ecrit:
> > I'm hitting the last assertion, not sure exactly where it is coming from
> yet.
> Ok, I missed updating libc :) Now fixed. I'm however getting:
> task /sbin/getty(631) looked up a bogus port 4294967295 for 28000, most
> probably a bug.
> it seems the extension of MACH_PORT_DEAD doesn't work.

Thanks for checking. I think the comparison in gnumach will always be false
because the name is up-cast to a mach_port_t.
However, this change does not seem to be a no-op since we haven't seen this
message before, right?

> Samuel

Reply via email to