Applied, thanks!

Sergey Bugaev, le mer. 27 mars 2024 19:18:32 +0300, a ecrit:
> ipc_entry_lookup_failed() is used with both mach_msg_user_header_t and
> mach_msg_header_t arguments, which are different types. Make it into a
> macro, so it works with both.
> ---
>  ipc/ipc_space.h | 22 +++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/ipc/ipc_space.h b/ipc/ipc_space.h
> index 96d58942..9adbd3f7 100644
> --- a/ipc/ipc_space.h
> +++ b/ipc/ipc_space.h
> @@ -159,15 +159,19 @@ ipc_entry_lookup(
>  
>  extern volatile boolean_t mach_port_deallocate_debug;
>  
> -static inline void
> -ipc_entry_lookup_failed(mach_msg_header_t *msg, mach_port_name_t name)
> -{
> -     if (name == MACH_PORT_NAME_NULL || name == MACH_PORT_NAME_DEAD)
> -             return;
> -     printf("task %.*s looked up a bogus port %lu for %d, most probably a 
> bug.\n", (int) sizeof current_task()->name, current_task()->name, (unsigned 
> long) name, msg->msgh_id);
> -     if (mach_port_deallocate_debug)
> -             SoftDebugger("ipc_entry_lookup");
> -}
> +#define ipc_entry_lookup_failed(msg, port_name)                              
> \
> +MACRO_BEGIN                                                          \
> +     if (MACH_PORT_NAME_VALID(port_name)) {                          \
> +             printf("task %.*s looked up a bogus port %lu for %d, "  \
> +                    "most probably a bug.\n",                        \
> +                     (int) sizeof current_task()->name,              \
> +                     current_task()->name,                           \
> +                     (unsigned long) (port_name),                    \
> +                     (msg)->msgh_id);                                \
> +             if (mach_port_deallocate_debug)                         \
> +                     SoftDebugger("ipc_entry_lookup");               \
> +     }                                                               \
> +MACRO_END
>  
>  /*
>   *   Routine:        ipc_entry_get
> -- 
> 2.44.0
> 

-- 
Samuel
---
Pour une évaluation indépendante, transparente et rigoureuse !
Je soutiens la Commission d'Évaluation de l'Inria.

Reply via email to