> On 31 May 2026, at 22:04, Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > Thanks for reviving the effort :D > > I have pushed a few trivial patches which don't even pose copyright > questions. I let you discuss with Sergey and Jessica :) > > Samuel Hi Samuel, I saw the MIG patches you pushed thanks. Sergey, I went a bit silent as I am finishing up setting a sane cross compilation environment that will allow me to continue my experiments in a better way. But I was thinking for now, in a ew days, to raise a couple of pull request to your branch in GitHub repo wip-aarch64 branche. To add the couple of real bug fixes we found on these patches I sent, and hopefully a PL011 working driver. From there if you prefer to create the gnumach patches yourself, would make more sense. What do you think? Paulo,
- Re: [RFC PATCH 03/18] aarch64: ... Paulo Fernando Barbosa Duarte
- [RFC PATCH 09/18] device/dtb: read 8-byte ce... Paulo Duarte
- Re: [RFC PATCH 09/18] device/dtb: read ... Sergey Bugaev
- Re: [RFC PATCH 09/18] device/dtb: r... Paulo Fernando Barbosa Duarte
- [RFC PATCH 08/18] aarch64: move boot stack o... Paulo Duarte
- Re: [RFC PATCH 08/18] aarch64: move boo... Sergey Bugaev
- Re: [RFC PATCH 08/18] aarch64: move... Paulo Fernando Barbosa Duarte
- Re: [RFC PATCH 08/18] aarch64: ... Sergey Bugaev
- Re: [RFC PATCH 08/18] aarch... Paulo Fernando Barbosa Duarte
- Re: [RFC PATCH 00/18] aarch64: kernel-side u... Samuel Thibault
- Re: [RFC PATCH 00/18] aarch64: kernel-s... Paulo Duarte
- Re: [RFC PATCH 00/18] aarch64: kern... Sergey Bugaev
- Re: [RFC PATCH 00/18] aarch64: ... Paulo Duarte
- Re: [RFC PATCH 00/18] aarch64: ... jbranso
- Re: [RFC PATCH 00/18] aarch64: ... jbranso
