Donjuanplatinum, le mar. 15 sept. 2026 23:13:36 +0800, a ecrit: > Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> writes: > > > Mmm, we'd rather make sure not to be guessing. Your change makes the > > code always use the given stat for "." and "..", possibly that's wrong, > > and thus why the code was special-casing "." and "..". You'd need to to > > put some prints there and really test the situation to be sure what is > > correct. > > > > Samuel > > Hi Samuel, I have tested it. For what your suggest, I added some print > in the if-else branches. I think the simply adding an else branch is the > correct behavior as what your point at first(and i attached it below). > Because my patch destory > the behavior of hurd. > > And I also checked the linux libfuse implementation, It does not > specially handle the "." and "..". > > So i would like to ask for your opinion on this :) .
Applied, thanks! Samuel
