"De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com> writes:
> Hello, > > This is not really a bug on indent, I would say, but I am seeing differences > in how C code is indented with 2.2.13 against 2.2.12. > With 2.2.12, the code as it is looks OK, but with 2.2.13, it makes the > following change. > > -uint32_t crc32_gzip_refl_base(uint32_t seed, uint8_t * buf, uint64_t len) > +uint32_t crc32_gzip_refl_base(uint32_t seed, uint8_t *buf, uint64_t len) > > Is there a way to avoid the 2.2.13 to make this change, so it is compatible > with 2.2.12 (which is still present in many distros)? FWIW, I've adopted the approach to make this indentation change in the project I help maintain, because it is arguable fixing a bug, and then say that GNU indent 2.2.13 is required to re-indent source code, and have updated CI/CD testing to only verify code indentation using 2.2.13. Not really an answer to your question, but maybe it will encourage you to adopt a similar solution that I have... /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
