Hi Collin, On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 03:03:43PM -0700, Collin Funk wrote: > Erik Auerswald <auers...@unix-ag.uni-kl.de> writes: > > > as a first attempt at testing "ping" without requiring root, the following > > patch works for me. Do we need to add a check if "cut" is available? > > Since the "id -G" is only used on systems with the kernel Linux, it may > > be OK without a check, or should we add one? > > Both 'cut' and 'id' are a part of POSIX so they should be fine IMO.
I'd think so, too. Nevertheless, the test suite attempts to also check for the existence of POSIX tools (but it does not use the prepared test for the id program in any test scripts, for example) and even works around a missing "-u" option for "id" in an attempt to work on many older systems, too. I'd think it is OK to just add use of both "cut" and "id -G" inside a Linux-specific part of the test, and fix problems later, if any should arise. But if anyone already knows where the new code would create problems, I would be happy to add some checks. Br, Erik
