Hi Alfred, > -----Original Message----- > From: Alfred M. Szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: 01 May 2005 07:51 > > I suppose that I could instead change the reading code, but other > implementations I found (netkit-rsh-0.17 and rsh-redone-66) seemed > to expect the modification time first. > > Seemed?
That's what the code implied to my layman's eyes. You can see for yourself here ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/linux/Networking/netkit/netkit-rsh-0.17.tar.g z http://svn.sliepen.eu.org/rsh-redone/ I didn't try out those implementations, but there seem to be Debian packages of both and RPMs of netkit-rsh. > I guess that we should do whatever the other rcp > implementations do here. > > Is there a protocol specification I could check to be sure? > > You might wish to check the RFC's if they have anything. I already checked that, but a quick search for "rcp" and "rsh" didn't reveal anything useful. Thanks, Tim. > Cheers! > _______________________________________________ Bug-inetutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-inetutils
