I guess we can ignore this bug, for now... ------- Start of forwarded message ------- From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 17:07:56 GMT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [bug-inetutils] Inetutils-1.4.2 not registering sgi_fam
This has been a while back, I've forgotten the exact circumstances. It turned out FAM was the only thing I had inetd starting, so as a workaround I started it in rc3.d. My understanding is "sunrpc" is the port that needs to be in services. Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/ Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates." (I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-) - -- "Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mar 4 15:34:34 pallas inetd[2160]: sgi_fam/1-2/rpc/tcp: unknown service Is the service "sgi_fam/1-2/rpc" defined in /etc/services (from the looks `sgi_fam/1-2' is defined, but the syntax for this error message is stupid so maybe it needs a /rpc in /etc/services)? As I understand it, it worked on one platform, and then when you moved the binaries it stopped working, so maybe it is just a /etc/services disreprency. Could you check the content of those files on both systems? I'll install a patch that chanes the log message for this particular message to differentiate between the protocol and the service, the new format will be: syslog (LOG_ERR, "%s (%s): unknown service", sep->se_service, sep->se_proto); instead of: syslog (LOG_ERR, "%s/%s: unknown service", sep->se_service, sep->se_proto); Thank you for your bug report. ------- End of forwarded message ------- _______________________________________________ Bug-inetutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-inetutils
