Does anyone remeber why we added gnulib to the CVS tree? I suspect that I had something to do with that... But right now I'm really reconsidering why we added the stuff, it is a pain keeping it updated. We don't keep generated files anyway in the CVS repo, so it would make sense to remove all gnulib stuff, if we can find a easy way to update/generate all the files.
Any thoughts on this? Does anyone object to removing gnulib if it is easy to regenerate it all running a script like autogen.sh? I was just made aware of some script called `bootstrap' that does what autogen.sh does, but it also pulls in gnulib (and updates translations, but we don't use that--yet). Not sure how that works, but if it makes things easier for us... I'll investigate a bit more, and experiment. _______________________________________________ Bug-inetutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-inetutils
