"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It might be smart to make a note in TODO that ping and ping6 should > share the majority of their parsing detailes instead of duplicating it > in two places. The only difference between the two should be that one > works with IPv6 and the other with IPv4. But that too should probobly > be in a seperate patch.
Btw, why can't 'ping' support IPv6? I know there is a tradition to have a ping6 tool for IPv6, but it seems preferable to add support for IPv6 straight into ping. Is there anything that makes this impossible or awkward to implement? /Simon _______________________________________________ bug-inetutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-inetutils
