> Wouldn't it be better to use argp_error in those parts? Or do > those actually do parsing?
No. According to the manual, argp_error is for handling parsing errors, while argp_failure is for other things like illegal values, etc.. In any case argp_error also needs the 'struct argp_state *state' pointer. Hm, What about using argp children? And changing for example changeif.c into a argp child, the same for system/*. The manual should have some examples, and documentation. You sure did pick one of the most complex programs to work on... _______________________________________________ bug-inetutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-inetutils
