> Some of the files are copyrighted to "The Regents of the > University of California" instead of "Free Software > Foundation". Is it alright for me to edit those? > > Yes, but do not change the copyright blurb, and do not add a year > to them. They are still copyrighted by the UOC.
Would it be useful to make it clear that new contributions and changes are licensed under the GPL, or is that not the intention? Adding the GPL license headers, and increment the copyright years there, would then be appropriate. It would be useful and it is important to do so, and I'm kinda in the process of doing that. Only that the whole `when to add a year' issue confuses me greatly. The current state of all the headers and files is quite bad. _______________________________________________ bug-inetutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-inetutils
