>> So where is the prototype for add_history coming from in >> Inetutls? Should not we refer to history.h and/or -lhistory >> too as just as we do for readline.h and -lreadline?
> C never required that you need to specify a prototype for a > function. Try enabling warnings, and you will see. That is true. What I meant was should we #include <readline/history.h> and/or enable warnings? Yes. >> Or in other terms why should we check for add_history in both >> libreadline _and_ libhistory? > Because add_history is can be part of another library. "another" or "either" ? Yes. _______________________________________________ bug-inetutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-inetutils
