On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Alfred M. Szmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
> And I don't think I've ever liked the change, and I'm happy it has > been reverted now, so I think I'll be packaging a git snapshot for > Debian pretty soon. > > I'd prefer not to see a CVS version of inetutils packaged in Debian, > since it puts a extra burden on us; we would have to make sure that > the CVS version is always usable/stable. I am planing on making a new > release very soon. > There is no burden on upstream - the right answer to distro consumers of a package who come upstream looking for help is to refer them back to the distro. -- Jeff Bailey - http://www.raspberryginger.com/jbailey/ "This specification should be read like all other specifications. First, it should be read cover-to-cover, multiple times. Then, it should be read backwards at least once. Then it should be read by picking random sections from the contents list and following all the cross-references." - HTML5
